film grain: that is generally primarily based on ISO – as in digital images, in which high ISO speed consequences in picturenoise, higher movie velocity generally results in extra movie grain. that is appropriate for a few pix i.e. in case you‘re looking to get a gritty avenue image etc. however might now not paintings with a panorama with sky and water in whichyou are seeking out clean easy textures. some types of movie clearly handle grain higher than others, so this is in whichthe use of films and seeing actual outcomes enables more than just reading about the theory. for example, Kodak Ektar is supposedly the best grain coloration movie in the world! Having used both Ektar (ISO one hundred) and Fuji Reala (ISO one hundred), I honestly can’t spot the distinction between the 2. however, using a black and white Kodak Tri-X 400, and compared to a Kodak T-Max 400, I discover the Tri-X to be incredibly grainier than the T-Max. but like I stated, a few grain will accentuate a picture, and enhance it…do not be terrified of grain.
colour saturation: manifestly applying handiest to colour film, some film has the tendency to over-saturate and giveartificial, fake shades – some movies give beautifully natural shades, saturated simply right, and a few actually have a slightly laid back appearance to it that looks incredible. Of course, some look flat and stupid – you can adequately avoidthis form of movie in case you experience it’s flat. In black and white film too, the tones of the grays vary with every film – a few have harsh tones, and infrequently show any definition among black and white, even as a few have lovely gray mid-tones, and others have a appropriate silvery appearance to the grays.
evaluation: yes, contrast varies too. To me, this is in particular sizeable and critical in black and white movie. I choose my black and white movie to have a medium to high comparison – low assessment doesn’t work for me, although i’ve seenwonderful examples of low assessment black and white photographs. So once more, test!
From the different styles of movie i have used (i have been sticking to negatives), right here are a few characteristics that i have stated:
Fuji Superia/Superia X-Tra (two hundred, 400): my widespread colour movie. cheap, reliable, very good. i love the colorson this. no longer too contrasty, not very saturated… in truth filmes i would say the colours are slightly laid back. Grain is first-rate, and for ISO 400, i might never name it grainy. For random colour photographs, and mainly to check new cameras/lenses, that is my go-to movie.
Fuji Reala (one hundred): a expert grade film, that is one of the best grain films i have used. colorations are greatersaturated than the Superia, but now not too. quite contrasty, and once more, stunning high-quality grain. in all likelihoodmy preferred C41 movie.
Kodak Ektar (100): another professional grade coloration film. i might say the grain is as pleasant because the Reala, even though Kodak claims this to have grain finer than any other! terrific colorings too, and high-quality evaluation. just like the Reala, i might use this for landscapes, and keep away from photos – this kind of saturation isn’t very flattering for pores and skin.